The two types of agenda setting are institutional and systemic.
Understanding Agenda Setting
Agenda setting is a critical concept in understanding how issues gain public and political attention. It involves the process through which certain topics rise to the top of the public discourse and policymakers' consideration. The two main types of agendas define the different spheres in which this process occurs.
Institutional Agenda (Policy Dockets)
The institutional agenda, also known as policy dockets, refers to the set of issues that are explicitly up for active and serious consideration by policymakers. This includes topics that are on the legislative schedule, being debated in parliamentary committees, or under the active review of government agencies.
-
Characteristics:
- Formal and structured.
- Includes items on a specific schedule.
- Usually has specific deadlines.
- Involves policymakers and governmental bodies directly.
-
Examples:
- A bill on healthcare reform currently being debated in Congress.
- A new environmental regulation being considered by a government agency.
- Budget allocations reviewed by the treasury department.
Systemic Agenda
The systemic agenda encompasses issues that merit the attention of the general public. These are the topics that are commonly discussed in the media, among civic groups, and in public conversations. These issues may or may not reach the institutional agenda, but they are considered crucial by the public.
- Characteristics:
- Informal and unstructured.
- Reflects public interest and concerns.
- Can influence policy change over time.
- Often influenced by media coverage.
- Examples:
- Climate change as a global concern discussed in the news.
- Rising cost of living debated in social circles.
- Public interest in social justice issues.
Discrepancy and Societal Conflict
The reference highlights that when there is a large discrepancy between the institutional agenda and the systemic agenda, societal conflict can arise. This is because the issues that the public deems important are not being addressed by policymakers.
-
Why Discrepancies Matter:
- Leads to public frustration and dissatisfaction.
- May result in social unrest and protests.
- Can erode trust in political institutions.
-
Addressing Discrepancies:
- Policymakers should be aware of public concerns.
- Increased public dialogue and engagement are essential.
- Transparency in the political process is crucial.
| Type of Agenda | Definition | Key Players | Characteristics | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional | Issues actively considered by policymakers. | Policymakers, Gov. | Formal, scheduled, and deadline-driven. | Healthcare bills in Congress, new regulations from Gov. Agency, budget allocation reviews. |
| Systemic | Issues that merit attention of the public and are widely discussed. | Public, Media | Informal, public driven, can influence policy. | Climate change concern, cost of living discussions, social justice discussions. |
In conclusion, understanding both institutional and systemic agendas is critical for comprehending the policy-making process and the relationship between the government and the public.
