Airports banned liquids as a temporary measure introduced in 2006 to protect against explosives.
The Threat of Liquid Explosives
The ban on liquids was not arbitrary; it stemmed from a real security threat.
- The concern was that terrorists could use liquid explosives, which could be disguised as everyday drinks or toiletries.
- This threat prompted a worldwide, hasty implementation of the restrictions on liquids, aerosols, and gels (LAGs).
- The rules were meant to be temporary, but they remain in place despite promises of change.
The Implementation of the Ban
The response to the threat was swift and global.
- Airports around the world quickly enforced new rules regarding the volume of liquids passengers could carry in their hand luggage.
- Passengers were, and still are, required to place LAGs in small, clear, resealable bags.
- Specific volume restrictions, typically 100ml per container, were put in place for hand baggage.
The Current Situation
Even though the ban was originally conceived as temporary, it has persisted for nearly two decades.
- There have been promises of technological advancements that could eliminate the need for the ban.
- However, the restrictions remain a common feature of air travel today.
- This can be particularly inconvenient for travellers, as they must often purchase toiletries and drinks after passing through security.
Conclusion
The liquids ban at airports is not a result of arbitrary rules, but a specific response to the threat of liquid explosives. While initially intended to be temporary, it remains a security measure, highlighting the importance of airport safety. The ban was hastily introduced to protect against explosives and has been in place since 2006, despite repeated promises of change.
