Yes, definitely, art can be objectively good.
While the appreciation of art is often considered subjective, meaning it varies from viewer to viewer, there are viewpoints and established practices that support the idea of objective quality.
Standards and Criteria in Art Judgment
As noted in information from December 26, 2018, there are specific standards and criteria utilized for judging and evaluating art. These frameworks provide a basis for assessment that moves beyond personal preference.
The Role of Consensus Among Experts
Frequently, the perceived quality of a work of art is reinforced by a consensus of opinions of art critics and others knowledgeable in the field. This collective perspective contributes to a more objective view of a work's merit or lack thereof.
Factors Influencing Objective Assessment (Based on Reference)
- Existence of standards and criteria for evaluation.
- Formation of a consensus among critics and experts.
Based on these factors, despite the prevalence of subjective experience, the possibility exists for art to be evaluated as objectively good or bad. Therefore, yes, definitely, art can be objectively bad or good.
