The relationship between "botany" and "life science botany" is one of a specific field versus a categorization within a broader scientific area. Based on the provided reference, botany is a specific field of study, while life science is a broad category that encompasses various fields, including botany. Thus, there isn't "life science botany" as a separate discipline; instead, botany is a part of life science.
Here's a breakdown:
-
Life Science: This is a wide-ranging term that covers all scientific disciplines concerned with the study of life and living organisms.
- According to the provided reference, life science includes fields like botany, zoology, evolutionary biology, ecology, biochemistry, and microbiology.
-
Botany: This is a specific branch of biology (and thus, a branch of life science) that focuses on the study of plants.
- Botany explores plant physiology, structure, genetics, ecology, distribution, classification, and economic importance.
To illustrate the relationship, think of it like this:
| Category | Specific Field |
|---|---|
| Life Science | Botany |
| Life Science | Zoology |
| Life Science | Microbiology |
| ... | ... |
Therefore, when you refer to botany, you are implicitly referring to a field within the life sciences. There is no separate entity called "life science botany." It's simply that botany falls under the umbrella of life science. The reference states, "Life science is a broader term used to categorize subjects that study life. This includes - botany, zoology, evolutionary biology, ecology, biochemistry and Microbiology."
