CPUs can execute anywhere from 1 to 32 instructions per clock cycle.
To understand why there's such a wide range and why cramming transistors onto a chip is still beneficial even if few instructions are executed per cycle, let's break down the factors involved:
-
Scalar Processors (1 IPC): Early CPUs, known as scalar processors, typically executed one instruction per clock cycle. "IPC" stands for Instructions Per Cycle.
-
Superscalar Processors ( > 1 IPC): Modern CPUs are largely superscalar. This means they can execute multiple instructions simultaneously in a single clock cycle. They achieve this through techniques like:
-
Pipelining: An instruction is broken down into stages (fetch, decode, execute, write-back). Multiple instructions are processed concurrently, each in a different stage of the pipeline.
-
Multiple Execution Units: CPUs have dedicated units for different types of instructions (arithmetic logic units (ALUs), floating-point units (FPUs), load/store units). This allows parallel execution of diverse instruction types.
-
Out-of-Order Execution: Instructions don't necessarily have to be executed in the order they appear in the program. The CPU can analyze dependencies and execute instructions that are ready, even if they appear later in the code.
-
Speculative Execution: The CPU might "guess" the outcome of a branch instruction (an "if/else" statement, for example) and start executing instructions along the predicted path. If the prediction is correct, time is saved. If incorrect, the speculated instructions are discarded.
-
-
Factors Affecting IPC: The actual IPC achieved by a CPU varies greatly depending on:
-
Program Code: Highly parallelizable code (e.g., vector operations) allows for higher IPC. Code with many dependencies or branches can limit IPC.
-
Compiler Optimization: A good compiler can rearrange code to improve instruction-level parallelism.
-
CPU Architecture: The number of execution units, the depth of the pipeline, and the efficiency of the branch prediction all influence IPC.
-
Cache Performance: Frequent cache misses (when the CPU needs to access data from slower memory) stall the pipeline and reduce IPC.
-
-
Why Cram Billions of Transistors? Even if the achieved IPC is relatively low in some cases, having billions of transistors on a chip allows for:
-
Larger Caches: Larger caches reduce memory access latency, leading to faster overall performance.
-
More Complex Execution Units: More sophisticated execution units can handle more complex instructions, increasing efficiency.
-
Better Branch Prediction: More advanced branch prediction algorithms reduce pipeline stalls.
-
More Cores: Modern CPUs often have multiple cores, allowing them to execute multiple threads or processes simultaneously. This significantly increases overall system throughput, even if the IPC of each individual core is not extremely high.
-
Specialized Hardware: Transistors are used to build specialized hardware accelerators for tasks like AI (Tensor Cores), graphics (GPUs), and video encoding/decoding.
-
In summary, while IPC is an important metric, it's just one factor determining CPU performance. The ability to handle more complex tasks, manage memory efficiently, and execute multiple tasks concurrently, all made possible by having billions of transistors, are also crucial. A CPU that could theoretically achieve a very high IPC but has a tiny cache and limited hardware would be far less performant in many real-world scenarios than a CPU with lower maximum IPC but more robust supporting hardware.
