The guidance for ethical decision making involves acknowledging and challenging your own beliefs, perceptions, and biases to identify and thoughtfully evaluate different courses of action.
To elaborate, ethical decision-making isn't a rigid formula, but rather a process of critical self-reflection and reasoned analysis. It requires actively confronting your pre-conceived notions and personal biases, which can often unconsciously influence your choices.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
-
Acknowledge Beliefs, Perceptions, and Biases: Before making any decision, honestly assess your own underlying beliefs about the situation, how you perceive the people involved, and any biases you might hold. These biases can be conscious or unconscious and may include:
- Confirmation bias: Seeking out information that confirms your existing beliefs.
- Availability heuristic: Over-relying on information that is easily accessible.
- Anchoring bias: Overemphasizing the first piece of information received.
- Groupthink: Conforming to the opinions of a group to avoid conflict.
- Halo effect: Allowing a positive impression in one area to influence opinions in other areas.
-
Identify Courses of Action: Brainstorm and list all possible options, even those that initially seem impractical or undesirable. The goal is to create a comprehensive set of possibilities.
-
Reflect on Values, Perspectives, and Biases Shaping Each Option: For each potential course of action, consider the following:
- Values: What ethical values (e.g., honesty, fairness, compassion, respect) are supported or compromised by this option?
- Perspectives: How would different stakeholders (e.g., individuals, groups, organizations) be affected by this option? Try to understand their viewpoints, even if they differ from your own.
- Biases: How might your biases be influencing your perception of this option? Are you overlooking potential downsides or exaggerating potential benefits because of your biases?
Example:
Imagine you are deciding whether to promote an employee to a leadership position.
- Acknowledge Biases: Are you biased towards promoting someone similar to yourself? Do you have any pre-conceived notions about the capabilities of certain employees?
- Identify Courses of Action: You could promote Employee A, Employee B, or search for an external candidate. You could also restructure the team to avoid needing a new leader.
- Reflect:
- Employee A: Promoting A might be seen as rewarding hard work, but would it be fair to Employee B, who has different strengths? Does A have the necessary leadership skills, or are you simply rewarding their technical skills?
- Employee B: Promoting B might encourage diverse leadership styles, but are you overlooking potential weaknesses in B's performance? Are you being biased against B due to some minor mistake they made in the past?
- External Candidate: Searching externally might bring fresh perspectives, but would it demoralize existing employees who feel they deserve the promotion?
By systematically challenging your assumptions and evaluating each option through multiple lenses, you increase the likelihood of making an ethical and well-reasoned decision.
