askvity

What is the difference between justice and fairness in ethics?

Published in Ethics Concepts 3 mins read

Justice and fairness are related but distinct concepts in ethics. While both involve moral considerations, they differ in their scope and application. Justice is a broader moral and ethical obligation, whereas fairness is a more technical consideration, specifically about equitable treatment.

Justice: The Broader Ethical Obligation

Justice, in an ethical context, refers to upholding what is morally right and just according to ethical principles and societal norms. It's an obligation; we ought to be just. This can encompass various aspects, including:

  • Distributive Justice: How resources, wealth, and opportunities are allocated within a society.
  • Procedural Justice: The fairness of the processes used to make decisions.
  • Corrective Justice: Rectifying wrongs and providing compensation for harm.

Justice is concerned with ensuring that individuals receive what they deserve or are entitled to, often through systems and institutions.

Fairness: Equitable Treatment as a Consideration

Fairness, on the other hand, is about treating individuals equitably and without bias. It focuses on impartiality and ensuring everyone has equal opportunities or receives equal treatment, considering their circumstances. It's an ethical consideration, not always an absolute obligation. Sometimes, being strictly "fair" in one sense may lead to injustice in another.

  • Example of Fairness vs. Strict Equality: Giving extra time to a student with a learning disability during an exam isn't strictly equal, but it's fair because it levels the playing field.

Key Differences Summarized

Here's a table summarizing the core differences:

Feature Justice Fairness
Nature Moral concept and ethical obligation Technical concept and ethical consideration
Scope Broad, encompassing moral rightness, rights, and societal norms More specific, focused on equitable treatment and impartiality
Obligation One ought to be just Sometimes it's right not to be "fair" in a narrow sense, but the unfairness should be acknowledged and justified.
Focus Upholding what is morally right, often through systems and institutions Ensuring equal opportunity or equitable treatment, considering individual circumstances.
Example Establishing a legal system that protects individual rights. Implementing affirmative action policies to address historical disadvantages (while potentially creating a perception of "unfairness" to others).

In essence, fairness often serves as a tool to achieve justice, but it's not synonymous with it. A decision can be "fair" in one aspect but still result in an unjust outcome when viewed from a broader perspective. The ethical dilemma lies in balancing the nuances of both concepts to achieve the most morally sound result.

Related Articles