Based on the information provided in the reference, yes, Jumanji 3 was considered a flop.
Financial Overview (According to Source)
The reference provides specific financial details for the movie referred to as "Jumanji 3". According to this source:
- Budget: The film had a production budget of $200 million.
- Gross: It grossed $220 million at the box office.
The reference explicitly states: "No, it was a flop. The movie grossed $220 million against a $200 million budget." While the phrasing "No, it was a flop" might seem contradictory, the context provided by the financial figures and the subsequent statement confirms that the source considers the movie's performance relative to its budget indicative of a flop.
Here is a summary of the financial performance based on the reference:
| Metric | Amount |
|---|---|
| Budget | $200 million |
| Gross | $220 million |
| Result | Flop (Source) |
Understanding Movie Financial Performance
In the film industry, simply recouping the production budget at the box office does not equate to profitability or success. A movie's gross revenue must typically be significantly higher than its production budget – often 2 to 2.5 times or more – to account for various other substantial costs, including:
- Marketing and advertising
- Distribution expenses
- The share of ticket sales kept by theaters
Therefore, a film grossing $220 million against a $200 million budget, as stated in the reference for "Jumanji 3," is indeed considered poor financial performance and, as the source concludes, a flop, as the revenue generated is insufficient to cover the total costs involved in bringing the film to market.
In conclusion, based strictly on the financial data and assessment presented in the provided reference, Jumanji 3 was a flop.
