askvity

What are the Different Image Compression Standards Explained?

Published in Image Compression Standards 6 mins read

Image compression standards are methods used to reduce the file size of digital images, making them easier to store, transmit, and display. These standards primarily fall into two main categories based on how they handle image data: lossy and lossless compression.

Understanding Image Compression Types

Based on the provided reference, compression is two types: Lossy and lossless.

Lossy Compression

In lossy compression, the reconstructed image contains degradations. With this perfect reconstruction of the image is sacrificed with respect to the original image, but higher compression ratio is achieved. This is used commonly in multimedia applications. Lossy compression works by permanently removing some data from the image, typically information that the human eye is less likely to perceive. While this results in a smaller file size, it also means the image quality is reduced compared to the original.

  • Characteristics:
    • Smaller file sizes.
    • Higher compression ratios.
    • Irreversible (data is lost permanently).
    • Introduces artifacts or slight blurriness at high compression levels.
  • Use Cases:
    • Web graphics where fast loading is crucial.
    • Storing large numbers of photos (e.g., on digital cameras or phones).
    • Streaming multimedia content.
  • Example Standards: JPEG, WebP (supports lossy), HEIF.

Lossless Compression

Lossless compression, on the other hand, reduces file size without losing any pixel data. The original image can be perfectly reconstructed from the compressed file. This is achieved by identifying patterns and redundancies in the image data and encoding them more efficiently.

  • Characteristics:
    • Perfect reconstruction of the original image.
    • Lower compression ratios compared to lossy methods.
    • Reversible (no data is lost).
    • Ideal for images where quality and accuracy are paramount.
  • Use Cases:
    • Medical imaging.
    • Archiving important documents or photos.
    • Images with sharp lines, text, or large areas of solid color (like logos or diagrams).
  • Example Standards: PNG, GIF, WebP (supports lossless).

Common Image Compression Standards

Several different image compression standards have been developed, each with its strengths and typical applications. Here are some of the most widely used:

JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group)

  • Type: Primarily lossy.
  • Description: The most common format for digital photos. It's excellent at compressing complex photographic images with smooth variations in tone and color. By removing less perceptually significant details, it achieves high compression ratios suitable for web use and digital photography storage. It also supports a less common lossless mode.
  • Best For: Photographs, realistic images.
  • Not Ideal For: Images with sharp edges, text, or solid blocks of color, as lossy compression can cause visible artifacts around edges.

PNG (Portable Network Graphics)

  • Type: Lossless.
  • Description: Developed as an improved, patent-free replacement for GIF. PNG supports truecolor (millions of colors) and alpha channels for variable transparency, making it ideal for web graphics, logos, and images where preserving quality and transparency are important. Since it's lossless, file sizes are generally larger than JPEGs for the same image content.
  • Best For: Web graphics, logos, images with text, diagrams, images requiring transparency.
  • Not Ideal For: High-resolution photographs (due to potentially large file sizes).

GIF (Graphics Interchange Format)

  • Type: Lossless (but limited color palette).
  • Description: An older format that uses a limited palette of up to 256 colors. While its compression is lossless within that palette, the reduction in color depth can make it appear lossy for images with many colors. Its main feature is support for animation.
  • Best For: Simple animations, low-color graphics, icons.
  • Not Ideal For: Photographs or images requiring a wide color spectrum or smooth gradients.

WebP

  • Type: Supports both lossy and lossless compression, as well as animation.
  • Description: Developed by Google, WebP aims to provide superior compression compared to JPEG, PNG, and GIF, often resulting in smaller file sizes for comparable quality. It's gaining popularity for web use.
  • Best For: Web images (can replace JPEG, PNG, and GIF with potentially smaller file sizes).
  • Not Ideal For: Not universally supported by all older software and browsers (though support is rapidly increasing).

HEIF (High Efficiency Image File Format)

  • Type: Supports both lossy and lossless compression.
  • Description: A newer format that often provides significantly better compression efficiency than JPEG, especially for lossy images, typically resulting in smaller files at similar or better quality. It can also store sequences of images (like bursts or Live Photos) and incorporates richer metadata capabilities. It's used by Apple as the default format on iPhones.
  • Best For: Mobile photography, storing bursts of images, achieving higher quality at smaller file sizes than JPEG.
  • Not Ideal For: Compatibility is still less widespread than JPEG.

Summary of Standards

Here's a quick overview of the main standards:

Standard Primary Type(s) Best Use Cases Key Feature(s)
JPEG Lossy Photographs, complex images Widely compatible, good high-ratio lossy compression
PNG Lossless Web graphics, logos, images with text, transparency Perfect quality, alpha channel (transparency)
GIF Lossless (Palette limited) Simple animations, icons Animation support, small file size for simple graphics
WebP Lossy & Lossless Web images (replacement for others) Excellent compression efficiency, supports animation
HEIF Lossy & Lossless Mobile photos, burst shots High compression efficiency, multi-image storage

Choosing the right standard depends on the specific needs of the image – whether preserving perfect quality is paramount, how much file size reduction is needed, the image content itself (photo vs. graphic), and where the image will be used or displayed.

Related Articles