Based on the provided reference, 167 cm is likely considered short for a guy, whether young or mature.
Determining if a specific height is considered "short" can depend on various factors, including age and regional averages. However, using the provided reference as a benchmark gives us a specific perspective.
Understanding Height in Context
Height is often measured in centimeters (cm) or feet and inches (ft/in). To compare 167 cm to the height mentioned in the reference, let's convert it:
- 167 cm is approximately 5 feet 5.75 inches (5' 5.75").
What the Reference Suggests
The reference provides a specific point of comparison: 5'7". It states that:
- For a young male, 5'7" is considered a "good height."
- For a more mature male, 5'7" is considered "on the short side, but still ok."
Comparing 167 cm to the Reference Benchmark
Since 167 cm (approx. 5' 5.75") is shorter than the 5'7" benchmark provided in the reference, we can infer its status relative to that benchmark for different age groups.
Here's a breakdown based on the reference's commentary on 5'7":
| Height (cm) | Height (approx ft/in) | Comparison to Reference Benchmark (5'7") | Reference Commentary on 5'7" | Implication for 167 cm based on Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167 | 5' 5.75" | Shorter | Young Male: Good height | Likely on the short side or short |
| 167 | 5' 5.75" | Shorter | Mature Male: On the short side | Likely short |
Based on this analysis using the reference:
- For a young male, while 5'7" is "good," 167 cm (being shorter) would likely fall into the category of being on the short side or perhaps short.
- For a mature male, where 5'7" is already "on the short side," 167 cm (being even shorter) would likely be considered short.
Therefore, according to the perspective offered in the reference, 167 cm for a guy would be considered short when compared to the 5'7" benchmark provided.
