askvity

Which is More Reactive Between Calcium and Lithium?

Published in Metal Reactivity 4 mins read

Lithium is definitively more reactive than calcium.

As per chemical principles, lithium is more reactive than calcium. This is primarily because lithium is a part of the group 1 alkali metals, which are known for being highly reactive and are consequently never found in the pure form in nature due to their strong tendency to react.

Understanding Metal Reactivity

The reactivity of a metal is largely determined by its tendency to lose electrons and form positive ions (cations). Metals that lose electrons more easily are considered more reactive. This ease of electron loss is influenced by several factors:

  • Ionization Energy: The energy required to remove an electron from an atom. Lower ionization energy means higher reactivity.
  • Atomic Size: Larger atoms generally hold their outer electrons less tightly, making them easier to remove.
  • Shielding Effect: Inner electrons "shield" the outer electrons from the full positive charge of the nucleus, reducing the attraction and making them easier to remove.

Lithium: The Highly Reactive Alkali Metal

Lithium (Li), with atomic number 3, belongs to Group 1 of the periodic table, known as the alkali metals.

  • One Valence Electron: Lithium has a single electron in its outermost shell, which it readily loses to achieve a stable electron configuration (like Helium).
  • Low Ionization Energy: Due to its small size and the ease of losing its single valence electron, lithium has a very low first ionization energy.
  • Strong Reducing Agent: Its strong tendency to lose an electron makes it an excellent reducing agent.
  • Vigorous Reactions: Lithium reacts vigorously with water, producing hydrogen gas and lithium hydroxide, and tarnishes rapidly in air. This high reactivity is why, as stated, it is never found in the pure form in nature.

Calcium: An Active Alkaline Earth Metal

Calcium (Ca), with atomic number 20, belongs to Group 2 of the periodic table, known as the alkaline earth metals.

  • Two Valence Electrons: Calcium has two electrons in its outermost shell.
  • Higher Ionization Energy (than Li): While calcium also readily loses electrons, it requires more energy to lose two electrons compared to lithium losing one. Its first ionization energy is higher than lithium's, and its second ionization energy is also a factor.
  • Reactive, but Less so than Lithium: Calcium is an active metal and reacts with water and acids, but its reactions are generally less vigorous and slower compared to those of alkali metals like lithium in the same period. For instance, calcium reacts with water to form calcium hydroxide and hydrogen, but the reaction is less violent than lithium's.

Periodic Table Context: Why Lithium Outperforms Calcium in Reactivity

The difference in reactivity between lithium and calcium can be summarized by their positions and electron configurations:

Feature Lithium (Li) Calcium (Ca)
Group Group 1 (Alkali Metals) Group 2 (Alkaline Earth Metals)
Valence Electrons 1 2
Ease of Electron Loss Very easy (needs to lose only one electron; very low ionization energy) Moderately easy (needs to lose two electrons; higher overall energy required than Li)
Reactivity More reactive (e.g., highly explosive with water) Less reactive than Lithium (e.g., reacts with water, but less vigorously)
Natural Occurrence Never found pure in nature Found in compounds (e.g., limestone, gypsum)

Lithium's position as the first element in Group 1, with its single, easily removable valence electron, gives it an unparalleled drive to achieve a stable electron configuration. Calcium, despite also being a reactive metal, needs to lose two electrons, which inherently requires more energy compared to lithium shedding just one.

Practical Implications

Due to its extreme reactivity, elemental lithium must be stored in inert environments, often under mineral oil, to prevent reaction with air and moisture. Calcium, while reactive, is more commonly encountered in compounds and is less of a handling hazard than pure lithium.

Related Articles