The primary disadvantage of fixed size framing is its inefficiency when dealing with variable-length data. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Understanding Fixed Size Framing
Fixed size framing involves dividing data into packets of a predetermined, unchanging size. This approach is simple to implement but comes with its own set of drawbacks.
Disadvantages Explained
Here's why fixed-size framing can be problematic:
-
Wasted Space:
- If the data being transmitted is smaller than the fixed frame size, the remaining space within the frame is wasted. This leads to an increase in overhead and reduced throughput.
- For instance, if you use fixed frames of 100 bytes and you're frequently sending messages of only 20 bytes, you're wasting 80 bytes of each frame.
-
Fragmentation of Larger Data:
- If the data being transmitted is larger than the fixed frame size, it must be divided into multiple frames. This requires the sender to break down the data, and the receiver must reassemble it, adding to overhead and complexity.
- Imagine transmitting a 1000-byte file with 100-byte fixed frames. The file needs to be divided into 10 frames.
-
Incompatibility with Variable Character Encoding:
- According to the provided reference, Character-oriented protocols use 8-bit characters. This causes issues with modern universal coding systems, such as Unicode that use 16-bit and 32-bit characters. The fixed 8-bit size can lead to data loss or corruption when attempting to transmit Unicode characters. For example, if the system is trying to send a 32-bit character within a fixed frame size that only supports 8-bit characters, some information will be lost.
Comparison Table
Here’s a comparison table highlighting the key differences between fixed-size and variable-size framing:
| Feature | Fixed Size Framing | Variable Size Framing |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Size | Constant and predefined | Varies based on data size |
| Space Efficiency | Inefficient for variable data sizes | More efficient as frame size adapts to data |
| Overhead | Can have higher overhead due to wasted space | Lower overhead on average |
| Complexity | Simple to implement | More complex to implement |
| Data Fragmentation | Large data needs to be fragmented | No need to fragment or less fragmentation |
Practical Insight
In modern networks, variable size framing is generally favored for better performance. Protocols like Ethernet and TCP/IP use variable size frames to improve efficiency. Fixed-size frames may be used in specific, controlled environments where simplicity is the priority and efficiency is less critical.
Conclusion
Fixed-size framing, while simple, is inefficient when dealing with data of varying lengths. Its major disadvantage is wasted space when frames are not completely filled, and it requires fragmentation of larger data. It also has compatibility issues with variable character encodings such as Unicode.
