askvity

What is an In Depth Survey?

Published in Qualitative Research Methods 4 mins read

While the term "in-depth survey" isn't a standard, universally defined research method like "in-depth interview" or "quantitative survey," it generally refers to a research approach or survey design aimed at gathering detailed, comprehensive, and nuanced information beyond simple quantitative data. The concept of gaining "detailed and comprehensive information" and achieving "a deeper understanding of the respondents' attitudes and opinions" is fundamentally aligned with the goals of qualitative methods, particularly in-depth interviews, as highlighted in research methodology.

Understanding the Goal: Achieving Depth

The primary goal when seeking "in-depth" information is to go beyond surface-level responses. Instead of just knowing what people think or do, researchers want to understand why they think or do it, exploring the underlying motivations, contexts, and complexities of their views. This kind of depth is crucial for understanding intricate social phenomena, exploring sensitive topics, or developing a rich understanding of individual experiences.

The Role of In-Depth Interviews

According to research practices, in-depth interviews are used as a qualitative method for obtaining detailed and comprehensive information on the phenomena studied and for a deeper understanding of the respondents' attitudes and opinions. This method allows for significant flexibility. Interviewers can give full attention to respondents and tailor interviews to their needs and preferences, probing for clarification, exploring unexpected tangents, and encouraging detailed narratives.

Key Characteristics of Methods Used for Depth (like In-Depth Interviews):

  • Qualitative Focus: Concentrates on understanding why and how, exploring meanings and experiences.
  • Flexibility: Questions can be adapted based on the respondent's answers.
  • Probing: Interviewers can ask follow-up questions to delve deeper into a topic.
  • Rich Data: Generates detailed text or audio data full of nuance and context.
  • Smaller Sample Size: Typically involves fewer participants compared to large-scale quantitative surveys, allowing more time per individual.

How This Relates to "In-Depth Surveys"

While standard quantitative surveys excel at gathering data from a large number of people for statistical analysis (breadth), they often lack the mechanism for deep probing found in interviews. An approach described as an "in-depth survey" might attempt to incorporate elements to gain more detail within a survey structure.

Ways a "Survey" Might Aim for More Depth:

  • Extensive Open-Ended Questions: Including questions where respondents write freeform answers, allowing them to express detailed thoughts.
  • Skip Logic and Branching: Designing the survey to ask more specific follow-up questions based on previous answers.
  • Combining Methods: Using a quantitative survey to identify participants for subsequent qualitative in-depth interviews.

However, even with these additions, a self-administered survey (online or paper) cannot fully replicate the dynamic interaction, tailoring, and real-time probing possible in a one-on-one in-depth interview where the interviewer can give their full attention to the respondent's unique perspective.

Comparing Approaches

Feature Standard Quantitative Survey In-Depth Interview (Qualitative) "In-Depth Survey" (Hybrid/Modified)
Primary Goal Breadth, statistical generalizations Depth, rich understanding, exploration Some breadth + increased detail/nuance
Method Standardized questions (MCQ, Rating) Tailored conversation, probing Standard questions + extensive open-ended
Sample Size Large Small Moderate to Large
Data Type Numbers, categories Text, narratives, opinions Mixed: Numbers + Text
Interaction Minimal/Standardized High (tailored, responsive) Limited (no real-time probing)
Complexity Good for clear-cut answers Excellent for complex, nuanced topics Better than standard for nuance, less than interview

In essence, gaining "in-depth" information, as defined by the reference's description of in-depth interviews, is about achieving a rich, comprehensive understanding of individual perspectives, which is best facilitated by qualitative methods that allow for interaction and tailored exploration. While surveys can be designed to gather more detail than basic questionnaires, the term "in-depth" in research often points towards the detailed, probing nature characteristic of interviews.

Related Articles