Whether physics is more interesting than biology is subjective and depends entirely on individual preferences. There is no objective "better" or "more interesting" science between the two.
The provided reference suggests physics is superior because it fundamentally explains chemistry, which in turn explains biology. However, interest is not dictated by hierarchical reductionism.
Here's a breakdown of why the question lacks a definitive answer:
-
Personal Preference: What one person finds fascinating, another might find tedious. Someone captivated by the elegance of quantum mechanics may find the complexities of the human body overwhelming, and vice-versa.
-
Different Approaches: Physics often deals with fundamental laws and mathematical models, while biology explores complex systems and emergent properties. These different approaches appeal to different learning styles and interests.
-
Applications and Relevance: Some individuals are drawn to the practical applications of biology (medicine, conservation), while others are more interested in the theoretical implications of physics (cosmology, particle physics). The perceived relevance can significantly influence interest.
-
Depth of Knowledge: Someone deeply immersed in either field will likely find it incredibly interesting due to their understanding of the nuances and complexities. A superficial understanding might lead to boredom.
Ultimately, the "more interesting" science is the one that resonates more with an individual's curiosity, learning style, and personal goals.
