What is Tight Coupling in Spring?

Tight coupling in Spring, as in general software design, occurs when one class is directly dependent on another specific class. This means that changes in the dependent class can force changes in the other class, leading to inflexibility and difficulty in maintaining or reusing code.

Understanding Tight Coupling

Here's a breakdown of what tight coupling entails, based on the provided reference:

Direct Dependency: One class relies on the concrete implementation details of another. It knows about the other class's internal methods and properties.
Hard-Coded Dependencies: The dependencies are usually defined within the class's code, meaning that the relationship between classes is fixed at compile time. As stated in the reference, "In tight coupling, there are hard-coded dependency declared in methods."
Lack of Flexibility: Changing the dependent class requires modifications in the depending class, making the application harder to evolve and adapt to new requirements.
Reduced Reusability: Because tightly coupled classes are so intertwined, they are difficult to reuse in different contexts.

Tight Coupling vs. Loose Coupling

To better understand tight coupling, it helps to compare it with its opposite, loose coupling:

Feature	Tight Coupling	Loose Coupling
Dependency	Dependent on a concrete class	Dependent on an interface or abstraction
Flexibility	Low, changes in one class impact others	High, changes are less likely to propagate
Reusability	Low, components are highly specific	High, components are more adaptable and reusable
Dependencies	Hard-coded in the class	Passed externally at runtime

Examples of Tight Coupling

Imagine you have a UserService class that directly creates an instance of a DatabaseConnection class inside it:

public class UserService {
    private DatabaseConnection connection = new DatabaseConnection();

    public void saveUser(User user){
        connection.connect();
        //Save user logic
        connection.disconnect();
    }

}

In this example, UserService is tightly coupled to DatabaseConnection. If you ever need to switch to a different type of connection or modify DatabaseConnection, you would have to change UserService as well.

Issues with Tight Coupling

Difficult to Test: Unit testing is harder because you cannot easily substitute the dependent object with mocks or stubs.
Maintenance Headaches: Changes in one part of the application can trigger changes in other seemingly unrelated parts.
Limited Reusability: Components designed with tight coupling are hard to reuse.
Increased Complexity: Makes the entire system difficult to comprehend, maintain and extend.

The Spring Solution: Dependency Injection (DI)

Spring framework advocates for loose coupling through Dependency Injection. It moves the responsibility of dependency creation and management outside of the class to an external entity (Spring Container). In the above example, the DatabaseConnection would be injected into the UserService. This can be done in many ways through Spring, like the following:


public class UserService {
    private DatabaseConnection connection;

    public UserService(DatabaseConnection connection){
        this.connection = connection;
    }

    public void saveUser(User user){
        connection.connect();
        //Save user logic
        connection.disconnect();
    }

}

With dependency injection, you can now switch DatabaseConnection easily to a different connection, without changing UserService code.

By promoting loose coupling, Spring helps create more robust, maintainable, and testable applications.

askvity