A "good" Residual Sum of Squares (RSS) value is as close to zero as possible.
Here's a breakdown of why and what factors to consider:
-
Understanding RSS: RSS quantifies the difference between the actual observed values and the values predicted by a model. It's calculated by summing the squares of the residuals (the differences between actual and predicted values). A lower RSS signifies that the model's predictions are close to the actual data points, indicating a good fit.
-
Ideal Scenario: An RSS of zero represents a perfect fit. This means the model perfectly predicts all the observed data points, which is rare in real-world scenarios due to inherent noise and variability in data.
-
Why Lower is Better: A smaller RSS value indicates that the model explains a larger portion of the variance in the data, implying better accuracy and predictive power.
-
Factors Influencing Interpretation: The "goodness" of an RSS value isn't absolute; it's relative and depends on several factors:
-
Scale of the Data: If the dependent variable has large values, even small errors can lead to a relatively large RSS. Conversely, if the values are small, even a small RSS might indicate a good fit.
-
Sample Size: Larger datasets tend to produce larger RSS values, even if the model performs well.
-
Complexity of the Model: Adding more variables to a model will generally decrease the RSS, potentially leading to overfitting (where the model fits the training data too well but performs poorly on new, unseen data). Therefore, a lower RSS alone does not guarantee a better model; other metrics like adjusted R-squared, AIC, BIC, or cross-validation are crucial.
-
R-squared Value: It's common practice to look at the R-squared (coefficient of determination), which represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s). R-squared is calculated from RSS. A high R-squared (close to 1) suggests a better fit.
-
Context of the Problem: What is considered a "good" fit depends on the specific application. In some fields, a relatively high RSS might be acceptable if the data is inherently noisy or the problem is complex.
-
-
Comparison is Key: The most informative way to evaluate the RSS is to compare it to the RSS of a simpler model or a null model (a model with no predictors). A significant reduction in RSS with the proposed model suggests it provides a better fit than the simpler alternative.
In summary, while a lower RSS is generally desirable, its interpretation should be considered within the context of the dataset, model complexity, and other relevant metrics. A good RSS is ultimately one that leads to acceptable predictive accuracy and generalizability for the specific problem being addressed.
