Relative size, in the context of monocular depth cues, is a perceptual clue that allows us to judge the distance of objects based on their apparent size.
Here's a breakdown:
-
The Concept: This cue hinges on our prior experience with objects and knowing their approximate actual size. When we see two similar objects, the one that appears smaller is perceived as being farther away. This assumption is based on the idea that if both objects were the same distance, they would appear to be the same size.
-
How it Works: Our brains automatically interpret the size difference as a distance cue. If an object of known size appears small in our field of vision, we infer that it is distant. Conversely, a larger-appearing object of similar type is judged to be closer.
-
Example: Imagine a field of flowers. All the flowers are approximately the same size. The flowers that appear larger in your vision are perceived as being closer to you, while those that appear smaller are perceived as being farther away. Similarly, a car in the distance appears smaller than a car right next to you, indicating the difference in depth. The airplane example provided in the references also illustrates this cue.
-
Limitations: Relative size works best when the observer has prior knowledge of the object's actual size. If we are unfamiliar with the object, it is difficult to accurately judge its distance based on relative size alone. It is also affected by other depth cues, such as occlusion and linear perspective, working together.
In essence, relative size leverages our past experiences to interpret visual information and create a sense of depth in a two-dimensional image or scene.
